GenayaGenaya
Pricing
Support
Start for free
All postsGrowth

How to ask for Google reviews now: what is banned, what still works

By the Genaya TeamJune 24, 20267 min read

For a decade the standard advice for getting Google reviews was some version of: survey every customer first, send the happy ones to Google, quietly absorb the rest, and sweeten the ask with a discount. As of 2026, every step of that playbook is either a Google policy violation, a federal rule violation, or both.

Reviews still decide who gets the call in local search - that part has not changed. What changed between 2024 and 2026 is enforcement. The FTC now has a rule with per-violation fines and has started sending letters, and Google is actively punishing the gating tactics half the industry was built on. The good news: the compliant way to ask is also the way that produces the most reviews. Here is what is banned, what still works, and the exact system to run.

The enforcement era started in October 2024

The FTC Consumer Review Rule took effect in October 2024, and it did something a decade of guidance documents never managed: it attached a price. Violations now carry civil penalties of up to $53,088 each. 'Each' is the word to sit with - a hundred non-compliant review requests is not one violation, it is potentially a hundred violations.

For the first year, most small operators treated the rule as a big-company problem. Then in December 2025 the FTC sent its first round of warning letters. Regulators typically open with letters and escalate to cases, which makes those letters less a scare story than a schedule: the grace period is over, and review practices that felt safe in 2023 are now documented federal risk.

$53,088maximum civil penalty per violation under the FTC Consumer Review Rule
Oct 2024when the rule took effect
Dec 2025when the first FTC warning letters went out

One piece of housekeeping before the specifics: this article is operational guidance, not legal advice. If your review program touches anything gray, run it past your attorney.

Review gating is the first thing to shut off

Review gating is the pre-screen: a message that asks 'How was your experience?', routes thumbs-up customers to Google, and diverts thumbs-down customers to a private feedback form. It felt clever for years, and entire software categories were built around it. It is now the single riskiest thing a local business can do with its reviews.

Two enforcers care, for different reasons. Under the FTC rule, incentives conditioned on positive sentiment are banned outright, and the gate itself - suppressing negatives while soliciting positives - is exactly the pattern the rule targets. Google, meanwhile, treats gating as a violation of its review policies, and its remedy is worse than a fine in practice.

You can still survey customers, and you should still do service recovery when someone is unhappy. What you cannot do is let the survey answer decide who receives the Google link.

No discounts, no freebies, no prize draws

The most common question owners ask is whether a discount for a Google review is allowed. It is not, and the reason is worth understanding, because two different rulebooks apply and the stricter one wins.

The FTC rule bans incentives tied to sentiment. A neutral, clearly disclosed incentive - review us honestly, positive or negative, and get a draw entry - can arguably survive the federal test. But your reviews do not live at the FTC; they live on Google, and Google policy is stricter: no incentives of any kind for reviews. Discounts, free add-ons, gift cards, and contest entries all violate Google policy even where the FTC might allow them, and the platform's remedy is removal plus profile-level action.

So the operating rule is simple: nothing of value ever changes hands around a Google review. Not for writing one, not for a positive one, not for taking one down.

The compliant system in four rules

What works now is boring, repeatable, and faster to run than the funnel it replaces.

  • Same ask, same link, every customer. No sentiment pre-screening, no survey deciding who gets the request. Every completed job or visit triggers the identical message with the identical Google link. That is the compliance line, and over time it is also the credibility line: a profile with a realistic mix of reviews converts better than a suspicious wall of perfect fives.
  • Send it 1-2 hours after service. While the fix, the visit, or the delivery is still fresh and the relief of a solved problem is still real. A next-morning request competes with a full inbox; a same-window request catches the customer at peak goodwill.
  • SMS first, email as backup. Text review requests complete at roughly 34%, against about 4% for email. That is not a marginal edge - from the same 100 customers, it is the difference between 34 reviews and 4.
  • Steady velocity, never a blast. Three to five requests a day reads as natural growth to Google's filters. A one-day blast to your whole customer list produces a spike that looks exactly like purchased reviews, and spike-pattern reviews get filtered.

The text template, word for word

The wording matters less than owners think, but a few elements are load-bearing: identify yourself immediately, reference the actual work, ask for an honest review, and put the link in the first message. Never mention stars, and never hint at what the review should say.

A field-service version: "Hi Dana, this is Marcus from Ridgeline Plumbing. Thanks for having us out for the water heater today. If you have a minute, we would really appreciate an honest review on Google - it takes about 60 seconds: [link]"

An office or practice version: "Hi Dana, thanks for coming in today. We would value your honest feedback in a quick Google review: [link]. Reply STOP to opt out."

Both fit within two SMS segments, both go to every customer unchanged, and both use the word honest on purpose - it signals you are asking for a review, not a rating. If someone replies with a complaint instead of posting one, that is the system working: handle it as service recovery, and never dangle the link or anything else in exchange for an edit.

Rolling out a backlog without tripping the filter

If you have months of past customers you never asked, resist the blast. A profile that has averaged two reviews a month and suddenly collects forty in a weekend looks purchased whether or not it was. Spread a backlog campaign over 7-10 days, hold the 3-5 per day ceiling, and start with your most recent customers - their memory is freshest, and recent reviews carry more weight in local ranking anyway.

Then let the ongoing system take over: every completed job fires the same timed text automatically, and the daily trickle never stops. Steady beats spiky on every axis that matters - total count compounds, recency stays fresh, and the pattern never resembles the one spam detection is built to catch.

What to change this week

Three moves. Shut off any pre-screen that decides who gets the Google link. Delete every incentive from the ask - the discount, the draw entry, the free add-on. Put the request on a timer: same message, same link, 1-2 hours after every job, capped at a natural daily pace.

The businesses winning local search in 2026 are not running a cleverer funnel. They are asking everyone, asking fast, and asking the same way every time - which happens to be the one approach that regulators, Google, and customers all reward.

Frequently asked questions

No. Asking is fine under both Google policy and the FTC Consumer Review Rule; both target manipulation, not the request itself. What is banned is pre-screening by sentiment, offering incentives, or buying reviews - send every customer the same message and link.

More from the blog

View all
Genaya

Run your whole operation on one platform

Calls, scheduling, estimates, invoices, payments, and AI - one thread per client, across 36 connected products.